Expensive,
Kills the nation's
food supply,
Run by
States and US Government.
Based on
Foreign Treaties
to take before
Secretary of Agriculture and Interior.
A Ranchers' job
is to
Feed the nation,
Not the wolf.
The Secretary may make further requirements for a showing of undue economic hardship as he deems fit. Exceptions granted under this section may be limited by the Secretary in his discretion as to time, area, or other factor of applicability. 16 USC 1539 (b)(3)
Ask the Secretary what requirements are needed to show economic hardships.
to prevent economic disruption and harm to the western livestock industry, it is in the public interest to charge a fee for livestock grazing permits and leases on the public lands which is based on a formula reflecting annual changes in the costs of production 43USC1901 (A)(5).
Ask the Secretary, where is the protection for the livestock industry from the wolf.
The Secretary of Agriculture may conduct a program of wildlife services with respect to injurious animal species and take any action the Secretary considers necessary in conducting the program. 7 USC 8351
(4)the United States has pledged itself as a sovereign state in the international community to conserve to the extent practicable the various species of fish or wildlife and plants facing extinction, pursuant to—
(A)migratory bird treaties with Canada and Mexico;
and others
Wolves in relation to
Stock, Game, and the National Forest Reserves
These treaties were to protect agriculture.
If persons or property are in danger the species may be removed.
Whereas, Many of these species are of great value as a source of food or in destroying insects which are injurious to forests and forage plants on the public domain, as well as to agricultural crops, in both the United States and Canada,
Article II (E) The prohibition of the killing of migratory insectivorous birds, except when they become injurious to agriculture and constitute plagues, as well as when they come from reserves or game farms: provided however that such birds may be captured alive and used in conformity with the laws of each contracting country.
Article III (1) Exceptions to the prohibition of taking may be permitted in accordance with the laws and regulations of the respective Contracting Parties in the following cases:
(b) For the purpose of protecting persons and property;
Article II (d) For the purpose of protecting against injury to persons or property.
Interesting
Below are newspaper articles from early 1900's about wolves.
Remember the Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1911, was passed to protect the farmers' crops by protecting birds that ate insects.
1907 NM, 4 wolves killed a cow or calf every three day.
1828 Entire communities walked side-by-side to sweep wolves out of their town. Surrounding towns held a grudge.
Advantages given in a protected range compensation for money collected
I found this group of photos to just be incredible and lucky to have caught on camera. Of course its at one of our waters and right at our driveway. The calf was rescued by those longhorn cows and her mother, a hornless cow. The wolf can be seen circling around to get at her again. The calf was protected long enough to be hidden by its mother.
As of this morning, 8 days after the attack, we put the poor little thing down, she had gangrene, wolf bites are seldom not fatal. These wolves are artificially inseminated, bred in captivity, pups cross fosteres into wild dens, fed at each den piles of zoo logs until the pups are large enough to help kill calves and elk calves.
Find more at
WolvesAreCruel.com
Mexico Treaty based on Migratory Bird Treaty of 1918
ESA Treaties are based on the Migratory Bird Treaty.
The Migratory Bird Treaty was to help the farmers by protecting insect eating birds.
""for the protection of migratory birds and game mammals."
The wolf does not help the ranchers or promote the nation's food supply.
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.